Legal Opinion
Barcalo Manufacturing Co. v. Firemen's Mutual Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 21, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBastow, J.
This submitted controversy presents a legal question involving the interpretation of the phrase “ all direct loss or damage by fire ” as contained in a standard fire insurance policy.
The facts, briefly stated, are that plaintiff as part of the process of manufacturing hand tools was required to anneal the basic tool shapes for a period of one hour at a temperature of 1350 degrees F. This was customarily done by placing them in a gas-fired furnace designed to operate at a maximum temperature of 1750 degrees F. The upper limits of the temperature and the duration of the annealing period were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O'Connor v. Queen Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Way v. Abington Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Mitchell v. Globe & Republic Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- LL Freeberg Pie Co. v. St. Paul Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Spare v. Glens Falls InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Engel v. Redwood County Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Karadontes v. Continental Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Schulze & Burch Biscuit Co. v. American Protection Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Bowes v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975