Legal Opinion

Ashley Peterson, et al. v. United States of America and Does 1-100

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 5, 2026No. 3:25-cv-01916Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ASHLEY PETERSON, et al., Case No.: 25-cv-01916-H-SBC 12 Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITH 14 LEAVE TO AMEND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and 15 DOES 1-100, [Doc. No. 20.] 16 Defendants. 17 18 On April 14, 2026, Defendant United States of America (“the United States”) filed 19 a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Ashley Peterson, Mark Peterson, II, and C.P.’s First 20 Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim for 21 which relief can be granted.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API