Legal Opinion
Mendel v. Carroll
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided June 17, 1994No. Civ. A. 13306, 13386PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEN, Chancellor.
The pending application for a mandatory preliminary injunction requires this court to revisit a subject dealt with, albeit not very completely, on an earlier application for a preliminary injunction. See Freedman v. Restaurant Assoc. Indus., Inc., Del.Ch., C.A. No. 9212, 1987 WL 14323, Allen, C. (Oct. 16, 1987). As in Freedman, the stockholder plaintiffs in these consolidated actions seek an unprecedented remedy: an order requiring the board of directors of a Delaware corporation to grant an option to buy 20% of its stock to a third party for the primary purpose of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
- Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Kahn v. Lynch Communication Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- McMullin v. BeranSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- In re Orchard Enterprises, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
- Chen v. Howard-AndersonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
- Hollinger International, Inc. v. BlackCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
- In re Synthes, Inc. Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.