Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Cataldo

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1987No. 86-3826PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Michael Cataldo (Cataldo) was convicted on three counts for bank robbery-related crimes. He brought a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, arguing that his ten-year consecutive sentences under two of the counts violated the double jeopardy clause and that the proper remedy under United States v. Henry, 709 F.2d 298 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc), was to vacate the sentence on one of the two counts and allow the other to stand. The district court granted his motion but found Henry not controlling and vacated the sentences…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Juan Pimienta-Redondo, United States of America v. Alfredo PupoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Gerald Vontsteen, A/K/A Skip VontsteenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. State v. RaucciConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  5. White v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API