Legal Opinion
In re the Denial of Certification of the Variance Granted to Hubbard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 11, 2010No. Nos. A07-1932, A07-2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
This action arises from respondent Robert W. Hubbard’s application to the City of *316Lakeland (City) for a variance in connection with Hubbard’s efforts to build a new home on a bluff overlooking the lower St. Croix River. The City granted the variance, but the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) declined to certify1 the City’s action. The DNR upheld its decision through a contested case hearing pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, Minn.Stat. ch. 14 (2008). The court of appeals reversed the agency’s decision, concluding that the variance was deemed granted by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Application of MinnegascoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Resident v. NootSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re HaslundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In re the Denial of Certification of the Variance Granted to HaslundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010