Legal Opinion

Neef v. City of Springfield

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1942No. 26519. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

Appellants John E. Neef and Frances Neef are the owners of two vacant lots located at the northeast corner of the intersection of North Grand and Monument avenues in the city of Springfield. Appellant Anna Margaret Werner is the holder of an option to purchase these lots, and is desirous of erecting thereon a filling station.

North Grand avenue runs east and west. From North Grand avenue, Monument avenue extends north a distance of about three blocks. It is the main thoroughfare leading to Oak Ridge Cemetery and Lincoln’s tomb from the south. Although there is a slight jog to the east,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Haller Sign Works v. Physical Culture Training SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Michigan-Lake Building Corp. v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Minkus v. PondIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Koos v. SaundersIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Speroni v. Board of AppealsIllinois Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Trust Co. of Chicago v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People Ex Rel. Joseph Lumber Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Northern Trust Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Mundelein Estates, Inc. v. Village of MundeleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1951

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API