Legal Opinion

Milan Milling, etc., Co. v. Gorten

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1894PublishedCited by 40 opinions

FROM GIBSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Gibson County.. H. J. Livingston, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.

The original bill in this cause-was filed in the Chancery Court of Gibson County *591by the Milan Milling and Manufacturing Company against W. E. Gorten et cd., for the purpose of enjoining the collection of four notes, and the foreclosure of a deed of trust made to secure them..

In the year 1892, the Milan Milling and Manufacturing Company entered into a written contract with the Maish & Gorten Manufacturing Company, a foreign corporation, having its office and principal place of business at "Warsaw, in the State of Indiana, whereby the latter company stipulated tO' manufacture, deliver, and put…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Oakland Sugar Mill Co. v. Fred W. Wolf Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  2. United Shoe Machinery Co. v. RamloseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. Hart v. Livermore Foundry & Machine Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Puffer Manufacturing Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Ammons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API