Legal Opinion
Ammons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 26, 1905No. 2,154PublishedCited by 21 opinions
In Error to the United States Court of Appeals in the Indian Territory.
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, Circuit Judge
The contention that the summons was void merits little consideration. Section 5658 of Sandels & Hill’s Digest of the Statutes of Arkansas, relating to summons in civil actions, is as follows:
“The summons shall be directed to the sheriff of the county and command' him to summon the defendant or defendants named therein, to answer the-complaint filed by the plaintiff (giving his name) at the time stated therein,, under the penalty of the complaint being taken for confessed, or of the defendant being proceeded against for contempt of court on his failure to do so. The summons shall be dated the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Lehnen v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Farrior v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Sullivan v. Sullivan Timber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Chattanooga National Building & Loan Ass'n v. DensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Anderson v. Morris & E. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Denison v. PhippsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Martin v. Bankers' Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1916
- Chicago Crayon Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.