State v. Hummel
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSpearman, J.
¶1 A jury convicted Bruce Hummel of the premeditated murder of his wife, Alice. The main issue in this appeal is whether Hummel’s statements were properly admitted under the corpus delicti rule. That rule requires the State to produce sufficient evidence to establish the corpus delicti of the charged crime before a defendant’s statements may be admitted into evidence. The corpus delicti of a homicide case is proved by evidence, independent of a defendant’s statements, establishing the fact of death and a causal connection between the death and a criminal act. We conclude that there was…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Bruce Allen HummelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Zaida Cardenas-floresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State of Washington v. John Cameron Ira YoungCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Brock Maslonka v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille Cty.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2022
- Brock Maslonka, et ux v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.