Legal Opinion
In Re Winslow
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 31, 1991No. 90-K-2245, 91-K-1428qPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO ALTER OR AMEND, MOTION TO VACATE CONTEMPT HEARING, MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION, MOTION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF JURY BOXES AND OBJECTION TO THE APPOINTMENT OF ATTORNEY KATCH
KANE, Senior District Judge.
Debtors have for the second time moved to alter or amend my judgment of September 4, 1991, 131 B.R. 171, in these cases, contending that I overlooked several of their arguments. I address their contentions seriatim.
First, the Debtors contend that the presiding bankruptcy judge, Judge Matheson, is biased and prejudiced against them and should be disqualified. Debtors state that I…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- United States v. James David FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. James Edward GipsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- In Re WinslowDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hunter v. Winslow (In re Winslow)District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Winslow v. Solomon & Lindquist-Kleissler (In re Winslow)District Court, D. Colorado · 1991