Legal Opinion

State v. Maynard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 1997No. C 95-11-38719; CA A92752PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

The state appeals the trial court’s grant of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of methamphetamine that an officer found inside an opaque matchbox that he took from defendant. The state argues that the officer properly opened the matchbox as part of an authorized inventory process. We affirm.

While on patrol, Officer Kruger received a report of a person attempting to break into a parked car. When he arrived at the scene he found defendant attempting to open the door of a parked 1976 Chrysler with a bent coat hanger. In response to Kruger’s questions, defendant stated that it was not her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. RidderbushCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. State v. GetzelmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. Cruz-RenteriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API