Legal Opinion

Lunden v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1965No. Civ. 28474PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

Defendant, the County of Los Angeles, appeals from the judgment entered against it following a non- jury trial of an action brought by respondent to recover the reasonable value of the portion of the architectural services which he had rendered in conformity with the provisions of a written contract and which remained uncompensated at the time said contract was cancelled by the appellant.

Since the facts are undisputed, the issue presented for our determination is a legal question which can be stated in relatively simple terms. All but one of appellant’s assignments of error are predicated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Bohman v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Rocky Mountain Export Co. v. ColquittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Garrett v. William A. Cochrane Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. S. Cal. Thrift & Loan v. Sylvania Elec. Prods., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Cheema v. L.S. Trucking, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. Cheema v. L.S. Trucking, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API