Legal Opinion
United States v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 29, 1981No. 80 Civil 3060PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
In this suit brought by the United States against the architectural firm Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (“Skidmore”) on claims based on indemnification, breach of contract and breach of warranty arising out of a contract for the design and construction of the Joseph H. Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden in Washington, D. C., defendant Skidmore moves pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that all claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations and that defendant as an…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Unexcelled Chemical Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Company v. Latrobe Die Castingcompany, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- The Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company, a Corp. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Edlux Construction Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Medicare&medicaid Gu 34,121 United States of America v. Donald M. Kass, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. BurdetteDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1988
- United States v. Glens Falls InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1982
- Sven Salen AB v. Jacq. Pierot, Jr., & Sons, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Marathon Enterprises, Inc. v. FeinbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.