City of Birmingham v. City of Vestavia Hills
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The single issue in this case is whether the legislature, under its plenary power, may constitutionally change by local law the boundaries of a municipality to include property not contiguous1 to the municipality's boundaries as previously fixed. Stated otherwise, the question is whether Act No. 92708, Ala. Acts 1992, violates any one of three constitutional restraints on the legislature's power: Article IV, §§ 104(5), 104(18), and 105, of the Constitution of Alabama, 1901.
Act No. 92-708, a local law,2 became effective on October 7, 1992. It reads:
"AN ACT
"To alter or rearrange the boundary…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McPherson v. BlackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Peddycoart v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Ervin v. CollinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Home Indem. Co. v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Bessemer v. McClainSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Ex Parte WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- City of Daphne v. City of Spanish FortSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Natalie Versiglio v. Board of Dental Examiners of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Magee v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.