Legal Opinion

City of Daphne v. City of Spanish Fort

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 17, 2003No. 1012088PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The City of Daphne, Merritt Oil Company, Incorporated ("Merritt"), and D.V. Williams (Daphne, Merritt, and Williams are hereinafter referred to collectively as "the Daphne plaintiffs") appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the City of Spanish Fort. The Daphne plaintiffs argue that Spanish Fort conspired with certain members of the Legislature to enact an act annexing to Spanish Fort parcels of land ("the disputed parcels") while a first annexation dispute between the Daphne plaintiffs and Spanish Fort was pending in the Baldwin Circuit Court. Because we hold that a legislative act may…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Green Tree Financial Corp. v. VintsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Town of Cedar Bluff v. Citizens Caring for ChildrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Griffin v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Muhammad v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. King v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Dept. of Environmental Management v. LeafCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API