Legal Opinion

State v. White

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 24, 1989No. 10-83-01183, 10-83-03087 CA A47182 (Control), A47183PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for murder, ORS 163.115, and arson in the first degree, ORS 164.325, arguing that the state was barred from prosecuting him. We affirm.

Defendant, Kell and Harris were indicted for arson and the aggravated murder of Robert Harris. Kell and Harris were tried separately. Before defendant’s trial, he was called as a witness at Harris’ trial, but he declined to testify, even though he was offered use and derivative use immunity under former ORS 136.619. 1 He was found in contempt and appealed that conviction. Defendant then testified at his own trial, at which he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. SorianoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. State v. SorianoOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Butler v. DominMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. GrafCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Sawyer v. Real Estate AgencyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. NefstadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. SchwinCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API