Legal Opinion
Maddox v. Norwood Clinic, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided February 4, 1992No. CV-91-H-1452-SPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
HANCOCK, District Judge.
The court has before it the December 17, 1991 motion to amend filed by plaintiff Antoniette Maddox in the above case. In her original complaint, filed on June 26, 1991, plaintiff invokes Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, charging her employer with failure to promote her because of her race. At the time this action was filed, Title VII proscribed the alleged misconduct of defendant but Section 1981 did not. Section 1981 made unlawful racial discrimination only in the formation of contracts. On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- McLaughlin v. New York, Governor's Office of Employee RelationsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1992
- Kelber v. Forest Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Steinle v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- McCullough v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Rowson v. County of Arlington, Va.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.