Legal Opinion
Steinle v. Boeing Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 26, 1992No. 90-1337-CPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CROW, District Judge.
This case presents the thorny issue of whether the Civil Rights Act of 1991, which was signed by President Bush on November 21, 1991, applies to the plaintiffs Title VII claims which were pending at the time the Act became law. Steinle filed this case on July 11, 1990. The discriminatory and retaliatory conduct which Steinle alleges occurred prior to November 21, 1991. The court concludes that the Civil Rights Act of 1991 does not apply to Title VII cases pending at the time the Act became law.
Facts and Procedural History
On October 4, 1991, the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Denmon v. RunyonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- West v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Steinle v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Professional Service Industries, Inc. v. KimbrellDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Heller v. Foulston (In Re Heller)District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.