Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Warden

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 2, 2024No. 1:23-cv-02333Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND LORENZO BARNES, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No.: ELH-23-2333 WARDEN, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner Lorenzo Barnes, a federal inmate proceeding without counsel, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF 1 (the “Petition”). He also filed a Supplement to the Petition (ECF 3) and exhibits. ECF 3-1 – ECF 3-3. Barnes alleges that he is entitled to earned time credit towards his federal sentence. In addition, Barnes has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF 6 (“IFP Motion”).…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API