Legal Opinion

Wagner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 11, 2012No. 4D09-3264PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPolen, J.

James Francis Wagner appeals the final judgment of the trial court, adjudicating him guilty of trafficking in Oxycodone, possession of Xanax, withholding information from a practitioner, and two counts of obtaining Oxycodone and Xanax by fraud. Wagner makes two arguments on appeal: (1) that the trial court reversibly erred and committed fundamental error when it added the phrase, “for a lawful purpose,” to the section 893.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes (2007), “prescription defense” jury instruction; and (2) that the trial court erroneously denied his motions for judgment of acquittal. We agree…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Florida Dept. of HealthSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Kasischke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  3. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. Knipp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Krause v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Ramirez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report No. 2011-05Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  4. In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-12.Supreme Court of Florida · 2019
  5. Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API