Legal Opinion
Knipp v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 3, 2011No. 4D09-2364, 4D09-2365PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion for Rehearing En Banc.
POLEN, J.
We deny the motion of appellee/cross-appellant, State of Florida, for Rehearing En Banc. We also deny the appellants’ motions to strike the State’s motion. We do, however, substitute the following for our opinion issued on December 22, 2010, in order to expand on our reasoning for affirming the dismissal of the trafficking charges.
As they present identical legal issues, we have combined Knipp v. State, No. 4D09-2364, and Kiser v. State, No. 4D09-2365 for review.1
Appellant, Jeremy Knipp, appeals the trial court’s order withholding adjudication on two…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- State v. KalogeropolousSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- State v. SantiagoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Simpson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- State v. ShulerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wagner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report No. 2011-05Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
- State v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-12.Supreme Court of Florida · 2019
- State v. EspinozaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.