Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 16, 2013No. 4D10-4927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.

After a jury trial, Andrew Ramirez was convicted of trafficking in hydroeodone and possession of cocaine with intent to sell. We reverse the trafficking conviction because the failure to charge the jury on a “prescription defense” constituted fundamental error in a case where a question from the jury should have highlighted the absence of the instruction for the trial court and defense attorney.

Armed with a search warrant, fifteen SWAT team members forcibly entered and secured a home owned by Ramirez’s mother where they found Ramirez and his girlfriend asleep in a bedroom. On a nightstand…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Castor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. State v. DelvaSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  5. Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shedd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Gregory v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Valls v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  4. Day v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Garland McDowell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API