Legal Opinion

Mauga v. To'oto'o

High Court of American Samoa

Decided May 7, 1990No. CA No. 2-90Published

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion for Summary Judgment:

Introduction

Vani Atafua rented a car from Purse Seiner Services (hereinafter "PSS"), under a rental agreement which expressly prohibited other drivers.1 Subsequently, one Fa'afetai Tuatoo somehow ended up behind *37the wheel of the rented car, and an accident resulted. National Pacific Insurance (hereinafter "NPI") is PSS’s insurer for the third party liability insurance coverage mandated by the territorial Compulsory Insurance Act, A.S.C.A. §§ 22.2001 et seq., (hereinafter "the Act").

The victims of the accident are suing the driver Fa'afetai Tuatoo, the rental…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Konrad v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  2. Odolecki v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Atlantic National Insurance v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Malmgren v. Southwestern Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API