Legal Opinion

Idaho State Bar v. Meservy

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1958No. 8618PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETON, Chief Justice.

Defendant in this proceeding is charged by plaintiffs with being in contempt of this Court due to his alleged practice of law in Fremont County, without first having procured a license so to do. This Court assumed original jurisdiction, permitted the filing of the complaint and ordered the Clerk to issue a citation requiring defendant to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt.

Defendant appeared as directed, moved to strike Paragraph IV of the complaint on the ground of immateriality and other grounds, and Paragraph V as being conclusions, redundant and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Contempt Proceedings Against MatthewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Stanger v. HunterIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Maxwell v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Parks v. MathewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Idaho State Bar v. MeservyIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Idaho State Bar v. MeservyIdaho Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API