Legal Opinion
In Re Contempt Proceedings Against Matthews
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 1936No. 6382PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.
This is an original proceeding commenced in this court at the direction of the Board of Bar Commissioners of the State of Idaho for the purpose of obtaining an order requiring S. E. Matthews to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt of this court. Order to show cause issued as prayed for by petitioner.
Defendant moves to strike from the petition “upon the ground that the same does not constitute an action for contempt or any part of said action, but is wholly insufficient upon which to create an issue, .... all of Paragraph Numbered V and all of Paragraph Numbered VI and all of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Illinois State Bar Ass'n v. Peoples Stock Yards State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- People v. . AlfaniNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- In Re DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- Eley v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- In Re Darwin Charles BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Hulse v. CrigerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- R. J. Edwards, Inc. v. HertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- State v. PledgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.