Legal Opinion

Fiedler v. Sanitary District of Bloom Township

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1935No. 22800. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Appellants, as real estate tax-payers and legal voters and residents of the appellee sanitary district, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, filed a bill in the circuit court of Cook county seeking to enjoin the issuance of certain bonds by the district. On hearing, the bill was dismissed for want of equity, and this appeal resulted.

The appellee district was organized on June 4, 1928. It includes an area of about 3900 acres with an estimated population of 23,000. On September 21, 1933, its board of trustees adopted an ordinance reciting that the building of a new sewage…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Cant v. CrossleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People ex rel. Agnew v. GrahamIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  3. People ex rel. Mark v. HartquistIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Natural Products Co. v. County of DuPageIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Blattner v. DietzIllinois Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dowsett v. City of East MolineIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Solomon v. North Shore Sanitary DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Bilek v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Secco v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  5. The People v. SummyIllinois Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API