Legal Opinion

Secco v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 2, 1954No. Gen. 46,151PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Robson

Plaintiff filed her statement of claim in the municipal court of Chicago for personal injuries sustained as a result of defendant’s negligence and asked judgment in the sum of $5,000. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss, on the ground that the court did not have jurisdiction, and was sustained by the trial court. Plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court and the cause was transferred to this court.

The jurisdiction of the trial court rests upon an amendment to the Municipal Court Act passed at the 1951 session of the legislature, known as House. Bill 1188 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1951, chap. 37, par.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Cant v. CrossleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Anderson v. City of Park RidgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People Ex Rel. Simpson v. FunkhouserIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People Ex Rel. Barrett v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People Ex Rel. Lindstrand v. EmmersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Serwinski v. Board of Election CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. People v. SpencerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  4. People v. ProngerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  5. DMI, INC. v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API