Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Mark v. Hartquist

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1924No. 15807PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

On the relation of two citizens, tax-payers, property owners and residents of supposed Community High School District No. 104 of Henderson county, the State’s attorney of that county presented to one of the judges of the circuit court a petition for leave to file an information in the nature of quo warranto against William Hartquist and four other individuals, who were charged with usurping the offices of members of the board of education of the supposed school district. The judge granted leave to file the information and a summons was issued returnable to the October term, 1923. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Shallberg v. Central Union Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Miller v. Trustees of Schools Township 15 North, Range 6 EastIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  3. People ex rel. Arnold v. CarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Roberts v. EymanIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Gaddis v. Richland CountyIllinois Supreme Court · 1879

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Stratton v. Wenona Community Unit District No. 1Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. The People v. DeatherageIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Western Sand & Gravel Co. v. Town of CornwallIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. People Ex Rel. Ray v. Lewistown Community High School District No. 241Illinois Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People Ex Rel. Seegren v. SackettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API