Rhea v. Crunk
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Vanderburg Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Lotz, J. —
This action was brought by the appellee against the appellants to recover damages for the breach of a contract for the sale of corn.
The complaint was in three paragraphs, each declaring upon the same contract.
The answer was in three paragraphs, and the reply was a general denial. The issues of fact were tried by a jury, which returned a general verdict for appellee.
The only questions presented for our consideration on this appeal arise from the overruling of the motion for a new trial.
There were two bills of exception filed during the proceedings in the court below. The first bill…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. ChampionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Gish v. GishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- American Fire Insurance Co. of New York v. SiskIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GrebIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Pichon v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- H. W. Johns-Manville Co. v. South Shore Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Farr v. BachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Campbell v. ConnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.