Legal Opinion

Farr v. Bach

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1895No. 1,610PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Wabash Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

The appellant, plaintiff below, alleged in his .complaint, that the appellee and one William Farr were partners doing business in the firm name of Farr & Bach; that as such partners they executed their promissory note, payable to the order of the First National Bank of Wabash, for the sum of $1,724.65, due in ninety days from the date thereof, with eight per cent, interest; that the plaintiff signed said note as the surety of said partners Farr & Bach; that Farr & Bach failed *126to pay said note when it became due, and the bank instituted suit thereon in the Wabash Circuit Court and recovered a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. HazelettIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. American Fire Insurance Co. of New York v. SiskIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Maxwell v. BrooksIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Ohio Thresher & Engine Co. v. HenselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Harris v. CassadyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Travelers Protective Ass'n v. FawcettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Nickeus v. Lewis CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API