Legal Opinion
Ullo v. Smith
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 8, 1945PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action to recover unpaid overtime compensation and an additional equal amount as liquidated damages pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b).
The case was tried to the Court without a jury.
Plaintiffs were employed in the buildings at 392 and 394 Fifth Avenue as maintenance men.
The defendant, John Thomas Smith, was the owner of the two buildings and the defendant, Vought, Campbell, Ward and Nich-olls, Inc., during all of the time for which extra compensation is herein asked for, had acted as the Agent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LenrootSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- 10 East 40th Street Building, Inc. v. CallusSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Borden Co. v. BorellaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. James B. Kelley and Lena S. Kelley, and John Waltman and Doris WaltmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- G. A. Heft and Edna S. Heft v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Durkin v. ShoneDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. James B. Kelley and Lena S. Kelley, and John Waltman and Doris WaltmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- G. A. Heft and Edna S. Heft v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961