10 East 40th Street Building, Inc. v. Callus
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 regulates wages and hours not only of employees who are “engaged in commerce” but also those engaged “in the production of goods for commerce.” Sections 6, 7, 52 Stat. 1060, 1062-63, 29 U. S. C. §§ 206, 207. For the purposes of that Act “an employee shall be deemed to have been engaged in the production of goods if such employee was employed . . . in any process or occupation necessary to the production thereof, in any State.” § 3 (j). When these provisions first came here we made it abundantly clear that their enforcement would involve the courts in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mitchell v. H. B. Zachry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Bozant v. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor v. B. B. Saxon Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.