Legal Opinion
Movado Group, Inc. v. Caseiko Trading Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 11, 2012No. 12 Civ. 0855(JPO)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Movado Group, Inc. (“Movado”) brings this action against Defendants Caseiko Trading Company (“Caseiko”) and Amir Ben-Nissan (“Nissan”) to recover on a contract for the sale of watches. Plaintiff asserts its claims under New York contract law and the New York Uniform Commercial Code. N.Y. U.C.C. §§ 2-701-2-705. Movado has moved for summary judgment on all claims, seeking (1) summary judgment against Caseiko and Ben-Nissan in the amount of $281,341.52 and (2) a severing of Movado’s claim for attorney’s fees. For the reasons that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brod v. Omya, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Zalaski v. City of Bridgeport Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- El Sayed v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kasper Global Collection & Brokers, Inc. v. Global Cabinets & Furniture Manufacturers Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Osprey Portfolio, LLC v. IzettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- H.Daya Int'l Co. v. AraziDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Flagstar Financial & Leasing, LLC f/k/a Signature Financial, LLC v. Image RX, Inc. and Jennifer RascoeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- Jiangsu Gtig Esen Co., Ltd. v. American Fashion Network, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.