Legal Opinion

Osprey Portfolio, LLC v. Izett

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 2013PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

Appeal was allowed to determine the limitation period that applies to an action on a guaranty executed under seal.

Appellant, in his capacity as vice-president of Izett Manufacturing, Inc., executed a guaranty in connection with a loan agreement entered into by the company. The loan agreement entitled Izett Manufacturing to borrow up to $50,000 and was secured by a promissory note. The note and the guaranty both were dated September 9, 1999, and, pursuant to the latter, Appellant personally guarantied the payment of all liabilities under the note, including attorney fees…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dynegy Marketing and Trade v. Multiut Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  3. Conrad's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Transbel Investment Co., Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. City of Philadelphia v. LiebermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott's Development Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Harmer v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Terra Technical Services, LLC v. River Station Land, L.P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Driscoll, R. v. Arena, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Citizens Bank v. Lloyd, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API