Legal Opinion
Oakland County Prosecutor v. 46th District Judge
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 20, 1977No. Docket 26328, 26459, 26560, 26561PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. E. McDonald, J.
Intervening defendants were charged with conspiracy to violate the state gambling statute, MCLA 750.301 et seq.; MSA 28.533 et seq.; MCLA 750.157a; MSA 28.354(1). The district judge dismissed the complaint on the basis that the gambling act did not apply to this fact situation. The circuit court reviewed the action of the district judge and decided that the district judge erred in construing the applicable law. The matter is before this Court on an appeal from the decision of the circuit court holding that the district judge erred in his finding that the Michigan gambling statute was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney for RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- People v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Attorney General v. Powerpick Player's Club of Michigan, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. WeathersbyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. HarlanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Pruitt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Lawyers Title Insurance v. Chicago Title InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.