Legal Opinion
Margitan v. Spokane County
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided January 26, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00173Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 ALLAN MARGITAN, married and acting individually, NO. 2:22-CV-0173-TOR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 MOTION TO DISMISS v. 10 SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal 11 corporation, 12 Defendant. 13 14 BEFORE THE COURT are Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 15 Rule 12 (ECF No. 13) and Plaintiff’s Motion for Hearing with Oral Argument 16 (ECF No. 15). This matter was initially submitted for consideration without oral 17 argument. The Court finds oral argument not warranted. LCivR 7(i)(3)(B)(iii). 18 The Court has…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,272, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5268, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8535 in Re Stac Electronics Securities Litigation. Timothy J. Anderson Neil Singer Arthur Singer, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Gary W. Clow Douglas Whiting Robert Johnson Alex Brown & Sons Incorporated Lawrence FinchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Harvey J. Thompson, III v. William McCombe Christine A. Zook Local 192 Amalgamated TransitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.