Legal Opinion
Harvey J. Thompson, III v. William McCombe Christine A. Zook Local 192 Amalgamated Transit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 5, 1996No. 95-17207PublishedCited by 205 opinions
1Per curiam
Harvey J. Thompson appeals pro se the district court’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of his action, pursuant to the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (“LMRDA”), 29 U.S.C. § 401, against Local 192 Amalgamated Transit Union (“ATU”) and two of the union’s officers. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Thompson was an employee of the Alame-da-Contra Costa Transit District (“AC Transit”), a public entity, see Cal.Pub.Util.Code § 24561, and belonged to the ATU. Thompson contends that the ATU violated the LMRDA…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arthur Berardi v. Swanson Memorial Lodge No. 48 of the Fraternal Order of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Celli v. ShoellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Seven Resorts, Inc., Dba Bridge Bay Resort v. James Arthur Cantlen Delta Upsilon, an Unincorporated Fraternal Organization Stacey Lynn EppingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Frederick J. Diven v. Amalgamated Transit Union International and Local 689, Amalgamated Transit UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- John Smith, Mitchell Griggs, and Addie Steward v. Office and Professional Employees International Union John Kelly, and George PorcaroCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
3Cited by205 opinions
- Hawaii Stevedores, Inc. v. HT & T CO.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2005
- Smallwood v. NCsoft Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
- AL Educ Assn v. Chao, Elaine L.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Doe v. MannDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Friends of Panamint Valley v. KempthorneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2007
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.