Legal Opinion
Georgia, Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Williamson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 8, 1951No. 33441PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
We will deal first with the motion of the plaintiff to dismiss the bill of exceptions. The action or non-action of the trial judge respecting the provisions of Rule 7 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure for Appeals or Review, unofficially codified in the Publisher’s Pocket Edition of the Code, § 6-908(1), and which relate to the notice the trial judge shall require to be served upon a party to a bill of exceptions or his counsel to afford opportunity to determine its correctness, is not reviewable by this court. See Ga. L. 1946, pp. 726, 739, Code Supp. § 6-909; Ellis v. Gisi, 77 Ga. App.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Galloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Brown v. Western R. Co. of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Southern Railway Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cooper v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Hay v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Lam Amusement Co. v. WaddellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Midland Properties Co. v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- State Highway Department v. Hewitt Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.