Legal Opinion

Verizon Delaware, Inc. v. AT & T COMMUNICATIONS OF DELAWARE, LLC

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 16, 2004No. CIV.A. 03-542-KAJPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JORDAN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case stems from a May, 6, 2003 ruling (the “Ruling”) by the Public Service Commission of the State of Delaware (the “PSC”) interpreting a telephone interconnection agreement (the “ICA” or “Agreement”) between the plaintiff, Verizon Delaware Inc. (“Verizon”), on the one hand and, on the other, defendants AT & T Communications of Delaware, LLC and TCG Delaware Valley, Inc. (collectively “AT & T”). As is more fully described herein, the PSC determined that, under the reciprocal compensation provisions of the Agreement, Verizon owes AT…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  2. Rios v. BlackwellDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API