Verizon Delaware, Inc. v. AT & T COMMUNICATIONS OF DELAWARE, LLC
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JORDAN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case stems from a May, 6, 2003 ruling (the “Ruling”) by the Public Service Commission of the State of Delaware (the “PSC”) interpreting a telephone interconnection agreement (the “ICA” or “Agreement”) between the plaintiff, Verizon Delaware Inc. (“Verizon”), on the one hand and, on the other, defendants AT & T Communications of Delaware, LLC and TCG Delaware Valley, Inc. (collectively “AT & T”). As is more fully described herein, the PSC determined that, under the reciprocal compensation provisions of the Agreement, Verizon owes AT…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Rios v. BlackwellDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006