Legal Opinion

Rios v. Blackwell

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 7, 2006No. 3:04CV7724, 3:05CV7286PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Chief Judge.

This are voting rights cases. Plaintiffs seek prospective injunctive relief to guarantee access to Ohio’s recount procedures in future elections.

Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331,1332.

Pending is defendants’ motion to dismiss all claims under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, that motion will be granted.

Background

After the November, 2004, election, plaintiff Michael Badnarik, the Libertarian candidate for President, applied for a recount under O.R.C. §§ 3515.01, 3515.07. He claims he never received what he was entitled to because…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Verizon Delaware, Inc. v. AT & T COMMUNICATIONS OF DELAWARE, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Griffin v. State of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
  2. King v. WhitmerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API