Legal Opinion

John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Serio

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1962No. 2862PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellee’s decedent 1 brought this action on a group insurance policy, issued by appellant, to recover $421.90 expended on his wife’s hospitalization and treatment for a threatened miscarriage. The controversy in the trial court and on this appeal centers on whether her condition was “a result of” accidental injury, binding appellant to pay full compensation, or “a result of pregnancy (which term includes resulting childbirth or miscarriage),” for which appellant’s obligation was limited to $160, the maximum “Pregnancy Expense Benefit.” 2

The testimony, in brief, was as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. The G. R. BoothSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. DodgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
  5. Lee v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bushong v. Byung Kyu ParkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Murakami v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. Jerger v. Commercial Ins.Richland County Court of Common Pleas · 1965
  4. Barker v. Ina Life InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API