Legal Opinion

Lee v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 12, 1936No. 14314PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

This record contains a number of irrelevant matters which it is necessary to eliminate in order to clarify the relevant issues. The following statement is deduced from the relevant parts of the statement set out in the record, the evidence, and exhibits:

Lucile Utley was an employee of Seminole Mills and, as such, was insured under a group policy issued to the mills upon the lives of its employees. To each employee so insured was issued a certificate of insurance, which was subject to and under the terms and conditions of the group…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Black v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  2. Rasicot v. Royal Neighbors of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Ford v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  4. Corley v. Atlantic Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  5. Free v. United Life Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Houran, Admr. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CassinelliNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Winks v. Board of Education of Normal Community Unit School District No. 5Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Factory Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of America v. KennedySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API