Info-Hold, Inc. v. Sound Merchandising, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Info-Hold, Inc. (“Info-Hold”), appeals the district court’s denial of its Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief from an order, entered pursuant to a Settlement, Release, and License Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”), dismissing InfoHold’s patent infringement action, brought under 28 U.S.C. § 1338 (2000), against Defendant, Sound Merchandising, Inc. (“SMI”), doing business as Intellitouch Communications. Info-Hold contends that relief is warranted because (1) SMI fraudulently induced Info-Hold to enter the Settlement Agreement, and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by242 opinions
- Susan King v. Todd HarwoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Jane Doe v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Carter v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Johnson v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Jane Luna v. Ricky BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
237 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.