Baker v. Boxx
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FUKUTO, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from orders (1) quashing service of summons on defendants Charles M. Berg, Berg & Allen, Inc., and Clifton Boxx (Berg respondents), and (2) dismissing the action against defendants A.W. Ellis, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., First Pacific Bank, and Imperial Savings Association (bank respondents) for delay in prosecution. The principal issue presented is whether an amended complaint, filed and served by a new attorney for plaintiff, becomes void and ineffective to fulfill service of process requirements if the new attorney has not first filed and served a formal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Park v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Clark v. WillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Davis v. RudolphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Epley v. CalifroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Casey v. Overhead Door Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Rush v. WeinzettlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Saltzman v. Montana Department of TransportationMontana Supreme Court · 1993