Legal Opinion

Jones v. Lachman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 26, 1989No. A8609-05718; CA A48527PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment entered in favor of defendant after the trial court denied plaintiffs motion to amend her complaint to substitute defendants. We affirm.

On October 31,1984, plaintiff sustained injuries in a car accident. On September 22, 1986, she filed this action, naming Alan Lachman as defendant. In fact, the car involved in the accident was owned and driven by Tim Lachman, Alan’s son. On April 2,1987, after the Statute of Limitations had run, plaintiff moved to amend the complaint to substitute Tim as defendant. The motion was denied. On February 10, 1988, she again moved to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. Tyee Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Eldridge v. Eastmoreland General HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Contractors, Inc. v. Form-Eze Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Eldridge v. Eastmoreland General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Parker v. MayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. the TimbersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. McLain v. Maletis BeverageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Press v. Todd Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API