Legal Opinion

MacNab v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiff was an independent insurance agent. He represented, among others, the defendant insurance company. They had a written agreement which required that “risks previously canceled * * * may be bound only if previously approved by the Company.”

For many years plaintiff had handled all insurance matters for a man by the name of Darr. His liability insurance business was of some consequence and had been placed with defendant by plaintiff for some considerable time. Darr had a son, Joe, who had been designated by the company as an insured in Darr’s liability policy. However, an endorsement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States F. & G. Co. v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. American Surety Co. v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mayer v. First National Bank of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. Tom O'Brien Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Gangnes v. LangCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Nelson v. Liberty Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. Edmunds v. EdmundsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API