Legal Opinion

Murray v. Brown

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1932No. Appeal 339PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadteeld, J.,

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The referee made, an award in favor of claimant. This award was affirmed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board and on appeal the court entered judgment on the award. Prom this judgment this appeal was taken by defendant.

The referee has found, inter alia, the following facts: “(3) We find that Nathaniel A. Murray, the decedent in this case, on and for some time prior to February 3, 1931, was employed by Harry Brown, as a truck driver. This employer’s business was that of general hauling and the decedent in the course of his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Lane v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Morris v. Yough Coal & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Watkins v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Samoskie v. Philadelphia & Reading C. & I. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Witt v. Witt's Food Mkt. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. McFadden v. Lehigh Navigation Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Falls v. Tenn. Furn. Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Barr v. Atlantic Elevator CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Cowell v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API