Legal Opinion
MacKey v. Dobrucki
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 16, 1933PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
August 28th, 1916, Samuel Rosenberg, the owner of a farm in Franklin, executed a note and mortgage on the farm for $2000 to James Mackey. July 7th, 1929, Paul Dobrucki became the owner of the property subject to the mortgage. July 21st, 1930, James Mackey assigned the note and mortgage to Mary Mackey, the plaintiff. The note and mortgage contained provisions that the mortgage should not be foreclosed if interest on the note and taxes, assessments and insurance on the mortgaged property were paid “promptly.” In the mortgage itself, it was provided that so long as these payments were made…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Noyes v. . AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Giles v. . AustinNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Raymond v. SellickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
- Console v. TorchinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Mechanics Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Lettieri v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage EmployeesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Nicoli v. Frouge Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.