Wright v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
Appellant was prosecuted upon an affidavit in two counts: (1) possession, (2) transportation of intoxicating liquor under Acts 1925 ch. 48, §4, (§2717 Burns 1926). He was tried by a jury, found guilty and sentenced on the first count, receiving a fine of $100 and sixty days imprisonment. The error relied upon by appellant is the overruling of his motion for a new trial, the several reasons for which are hereinafter discussed.
Appellant was convicted on the evidence of a plainclothes detective in the Muncie police department, (who was the only witness in the case except two other police…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blume v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Coppenhaver v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Skaggs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Madden v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Hines v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rodríguez Ocasio v. El Pueblo de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
- Kraft v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1930