Legal Opinion

Skaggs v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1886No. 13,045PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.

In this case, the indictment against the appellant, Skaggs, contained two counts. The first count charged that the appellant, on the 27th day of August, 1885, at Montgomery county, Indiana, “did then and there, unlawfully and feloniously, in a rudo, insolent and angry manner, touch, push, strike and choke one Flora May Ennis, a woman, with intent then and there-and thereby, her, the said Flora May Ennis, feloniously, forcibly and against her will, to ravish and carnally know.” The second count of the indictment differs from the first count only in this, that the words “ forcibly and against…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hamm v. RomineIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Clayton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Padgett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Toney v. ToneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. State v. PhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. State v. Foot YouOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Reed v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Siberry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API